Second one goes to geese.
I apologize for the past and the @#%$ that happened. Going into details is rather pointless, not even I remember all of it (and I usually have a rather good memory).
But there are still a few things that are bugging me. JM, starting with number games when it comes to dead civilians in a warcrime (like Nanking, which, for me, lines up with Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Holocaust, etc) is pointless and, frankly, not the brightest idea. Sorry if this pisses you off JM, but that's how it is. Something like that pisses me off, actually. Warcrime remains warcrime, 1 dead civilian or 1 million absolutely doesn't matter, whether it hit Nanking or Hiroshima doesn't matter. Warcrime remains warcrime. (On that note, I really wished American schools would teach their kids the truth about certain events and not stick to the old propaganda, but that'd go too far now and doesn't have anything to do with you and me.)
Also, starting with "sacred" land in an argument is a bad idea, too. It's right winged and reminds me of the "blood and country" bullshit the Nazis spread before they got their asses kicked by the USA and the USSR. There is no "sacred" land. Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious said Oscar Wilde and I still believe he was right with that. Looking at history I have to say patriotism never brings out anything good. Patriotism leads to nationalism and that leads only to two things: Many dead, innocent people and devastated countries. Speaking of "sacred" land when it comes to Japan is just as speaking of "sacred" land when it comes to Germany or France, or any other country. It just doesn't exist. Usually, the next thing I expect when people start going down that road is stuff about "true Germans" or "true Japanese", whatever that may be. (Hate me now if you want, but I seriously doubt there are "true Germans". Given the history of Europe it's actually absolutely impossible, just like there are no "true Japanese", since the Japanese all come from Korean and Chinese immigrants thousands of years ago, while we all, ultimately, come from Africa anyway.)
Anyway.
I have no intention to ramble or rant about anything. That's just how I see it and I had to bring it up because it was still spooking around somewhere in my mind. As I said, hate me if you want, but I apologize for not managing to bring my point across in a more decent or understandable way. Though, that things get heated up is not really a surprise when people involved go down the passionate line. @#%$ happens, doesn't it?
Though, should you ever say again that I look down on Japan, I will have to kick your ass. Really. I completely resent that. I'm not looking down on it. Definitely not. It's a country, like all others, with good sides and with flaws (face it, it's not perfect). But I think it's the only country I would possibly fight for in a war (I'd sell my own country to any enemy without hesitation, trust me), simply because there's something to fight for there. There are people in this country who I value a lot, who mean a lot to me (first one to say "must be CK" gets a kick in the ass). Think about me what you want, call me a stupid, arrogant foreigner if you want, cuss me out, hate me with all your soul, whatever, but I know there are people in this country who I would die for without hesitation.
Geese... Frankly, what really pissed me off where two things. First was when you said CK was an already sinking star way back when the forum came into existence. Second was when you called the list of countries that take part in the "coalition of the willing" In Iraq a " laundry list of ineptitude". That actually pissed me off big time. After all, those countries, even if it's just a backwater country with 20 soldiers, is still putting their lives at risk with this move. To me, this sounded like the bullshit Montgomery wrote in his "History of warfare" -a very biased, towards the British, and completely idiotic book- arrogant and ignorant. Did I say that outright? No... But I should have, maybe. Oh well, too late now. Not much use to cry over spilled milk. The problem would have been that my reply would have gone down the passionate side again. And again, it would have gotten heated up for no particular reason. Once that happens, it's rather pointless to carry on, because there wouldn't be a decent result. Then again, @#%$ happens...
I really don't want to go into details why I do or did certain things I do or did. It'd go to far and I doubt you'd understand it. In fact, you don't need to understand it or know about it. You don't even have to accept my apologies, just accept that I actually did it. If you want to tell me that I've been arrogant and ignorant myself, save your energy. I know I've been and, most likely, still am at times.
So yeah, I apologize again, this time also for the size of this thing. I didn't really plan to make big. But oh well... I had to say a few things that were still bugging me. And, if you really want to know, I've been thinking of doing this for a while now, somehow to wrap it all up in order to close this file for good.
Anyway... That's what I wanted to say.


